Cost Effectiveness of Anak Broiler Chick Fed Fermented Mango (Mangifera indica) Kernel Composite Meal as an Alternative Energy Source

Authors

  • F. B. P. Abang University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi
  • J. O. Egahi University of Agriculture Makurdi
  • T. S. Hamber University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51791/njap.vi.5698

Keywords:

FMKCM, Broiler chick, alternative energy source, maize, cost-effectiveness

Abstract

A twenty-eight-day feeding trial was conducted to evaluate fermented mango kernel composite meal as an alternative energy source of feed ingredient in broiler starter. One hundred and forty-four-day old broiler chicks of about same weightwere randomly allotted to four dietary treatments comprising of 36 birds e. Each treatment was replicated thrice with 12 chicks per replicate in a completely randomized design (CRD). In each of the four diets, FMKCM was used to replace maize at 0%, 10%, 15% and 20% for treatments I, II, III and IV respectively. Feed cost reduced with increased supplementation of FMKCM. The average cost of feed intake per chick was not significantly (p>0.05) different. The cost of feed program weight gain reduced across treatments. More saving accrued at 10% inclusion levels, chick fed 0% FMKCM hadleast profit and RNI. Fermented mango kernel composite meal could replace maize up to 20% in broiler starter diet, however, for maximum profitability, 15%inclusion level is recommended as the optimum.

Author Biographies

  • F. B. P. Abang, University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi

     Department of Animal Production 

  • J. O. Egahi, University of Agriculture Makurdi

    Department of Animal Breeding and Physiology 

  • T. S. Hamber, University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi

    Department of Animal Production 

Downloads

Published

2024-07-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Cost Effectiveness of Anak Broiler Chick Fed Fermented Mango (Mangifera indica) Kernel Composite Meal as an Alternative Energy Source. (2024). Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 662-665. https://doi.org/10.51791/njap.vi.5698